Plans to force all schools in England to become academies will be outlined in the budget on Wednesday. The Department for Education is expected to publish draft legislation as early as Thursday, Newsnight has learned. The move would end the century-old role of local authorities as providers of education.
An aide to the education secretary has declined to comment.
Back in October, David Cameron said he wanted “every school an academy… and yes – Local Authorities running schools a thing of the past”. At the autumn statement, the official document stated that the government wanted: “The next step towards the government’s goal of ending local authorities’ role in running schools and all schools becoming an academy”.
The proposals under consideration by Education Secretary Nicky Morgan owe much to a pamphlet by Policy Exchange, the Conservative-aligned think-tank, which proposes mass-converting the remaining local authority schools into academies. That document proposed the change for mainstream schools, but did not deal with the future of special schools.
Local authorities, in truth, have not “run” any mainstream schools since the early 1990s. They, instead, supervise them and offer them back-office services. The principal advantages to school leaders of academy status are that they are exempt from the national curriculum and the national pay regulations for teachers.
This report, in short, would mean the end of the national curriculum and national pay scales. By forcing the local authorities out of mainstream education, it would also finally unpick the local authority system of schools put in place in England by Arthur Balfour’s Conservative government in 1902.
The changing academy programme
This would mark a third phase in the academy programme.
Before 2010, around 200 schools were opened as academies or converted into them. These were struggling schools that required fast turnaround or were opening in areas of educational weakness. These “sponsor academies” were given exemptions from the national curriculum and on teachers’ pay to help them adapt to tougher-than-usual circumstances.
From 2010 to the present, however, schools have been allowed to become academies if they wish to do so. These are known as “converter academies” – and were Michael Gove’s big change to the system. This was a popular programme (partly because academies got extra cash for converting). So at the last count, there were 3,381 state secondaries, of which 2,075 were academies.
There remains, however, a big rump of schools which remain conventional local authority schools – particularly in the primary phase of education, where the cash incentives to convert were much weaker. At the last full count, a year ago, there were 16,766 primary schools, of which 2,440 were academies. The remainder remain attached to the local authorities.
The think-tank report, Primary Focus, proposes that the government “convert all primary schools into academies, and then ask each school to join an academy ‘chain’ by 2020”. The remaining LA secondaries, it proposes, should be encouraged along the same tracks (although there should be less pressure to join an academy chain).
The Policy Exchange piece proposes an end to the local authority as we know it, with its reduction to a rump provider of specialist services. It continues: “Any Local Authority that wishes to maintain a school provision service and run a chain or offer support to schools within a chain must spin out as a mutual or social enterprise and become a legally separate entity.”
Finally, “in order for academies receive the most suitable support they require on an ongoing basis, academies should be able to switch between chains if certain criteria are met”. The idea is that chains should be kept under pressure to be well run.
There are a few implementation issues here. The biggest of these is very simple – we do not have enough good academy chains as it is. There is plenty of demand for school support services at the moment and some existing school chains are extremely weak; Ofsted has recently started to worry more about them.
This proposal would also create a lot of work for the Department for Education which has struggled with its existing workload. Since 2010, its role has gone from being a strategic body to deciding on rules for individual schools. The skills of its employees have not kept up.
Indeed, even the two most important things a Whitehall department must do, keeping to its budget and being accountable for spending, have proved beyond it. The free school programme showed that even the simple task of opening new schools was extremely trying for them.
Furthermore, this sort of proposal would require the DfE to fix a number of funding problems – for example, at what level it ought to fund small schools or schools with expensive private finance deals, for example. At the moment, local authorities absorb those problems. “Academisation” would remove that buffer.